Evans v. Unocal Termination Allowance Plan, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11773 (9^th Cir. May 22, 2000) (unpublished)-This court affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of Uncoal after it denied severance benefits on the ground that Appellants became a "purchaser" of the Unocal facilities employed the Appellants.  Since the Plans do not define the term "purchaser," Unocal had to interpret the meaning of the word in context.  Looking at the language of the Plan, this court found that not only was Unocal's interpretation not clearly erroneous, it was "sensible and reasonable."  Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion.